The rapid growth of prediction markets continues to attract scrutiny from a section of the Senate. Most recently is through the introduction of a bill proposing that these platforms stop offering sports-related event contracts to traders.
The bipartisan Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act is sponsored by Senators Adam Schiff and John Curtis. It argues that allowing these platforms to do this infringes on tribal sovereignty. Additionally, the senators question whether any public revenue is derived from these platforms and the integrity of the markets. With the bill yet to be passed, what could happen next?
The heat prediction markets keep getting is not new. Right from the time they appeared on the scene in the U.S., there were questions about their legality and market integrity.
Unlike traditional land-based casinos, prediction markets sites can be accessed from anywhere in the U.S. Even more exciting for traders was access to real-time event contracts across diverse niches, from culture to politics, and even sports. This made them quite a hit, and in no time, the trading volume on these sites was incredible to say the least.
This got lawmakers interested. Initially, it was just concerns about insider trading and whether there were frameworks to curb that. Then it became a matter of how they are regulated. With the CFTC classifying them as derivatives markets, why are they offering athletic event contracts? Wasn’t this disadvantageous to tribes whose sovereignty depended on control of gaming products?
That prompted Senator Schiff (Democrat-California) and his Republican peer, John Curtis (Utah), to propose the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act in March. Its key recommendation is to ban sports contracts on prediction markets.
The bill has yet to pass, but some key factors could help it become law. They are:
No matter how compelling the reasons for a ban are, it’s worth considering the other side of the argument. These could potentially pose a challenge to the ban, and they include:
Calls for tighter regulation of prediction markets have intensified as the platforms’ growth has exploded. The Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, introduced to the Senate by Senators Adam Schiff and John Curtis, is just one example of this push. The bill, if successful, would ban these sites from offering sports-related and casino-style contracts.
More than two months since its floating, it remains to be seen if it will pass. While discussions around it continue, you can still leverage these event contracts on platforms like Kalshi. Use any of our on-page banners to get started.

Disclaimer: All of the information on this site is for entertainment purposes only. We do NOT accept bets of any kind. The information we provide is accurate and trustworthy to help you make better decisions. When you click or tap on a link on Dimers that leads to a third-party website that we have a commercial arrangement with (such as an online sportsbook), we may earn referral fees. Dimers does not endorse or encourage illegal or irresponsible gambling in any form. Before placing any wagers with any betting site, you must check the online gambling regulations in your jurisdiction or state, as they do vary. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER.
Copyright © [yyyy] Dimers. All Rights Reserved. Proudly part of Cipher Sports Technology Group, 902A Broadway, Floors 6 & 7, New York, NY 10010, United States of America.