Tennis bets today: Our best pick for Medvedev vs. Paul on Friday [10/16/2026]
Get ATP & WTA predictions and picks for Friday, October 16, 2026.

Today’s tennis picks for October 16, 2026 are here, with Daniil Medvedev vs. Tommy Paul among the top plays identified by our model across Friday’s tennis slate.
Dimers’ predictive analytics engine runs 24/7, scanning the latest tennis odds to discover legitimate betting edges. The result? Data-backed picks that help Dimers Pro members make smarter decisions.
List of tennis picks today [10/16, updated 2:03AM ET]
Below, you’ll find today’s tennis best bets, ranked by edge for Friday, October 16, 2026.
ATP Shanghai Masters: Tommy Paul ML (+195)
- Edge: 2.4%
- Probability: 36.7%
- Matchup: Daniil Medvedev vs. Tommy Paul (6:00AM ET)
Our model has identified value on Tommy Paul to defeat Daniil Medvedev at +195 odds in their matchup at ATP Shanghai Masters. A 36.7% probability produces an edge of 2.4%, making this the strongest play for today's tennis slate.
Tennis best bets summary: Friday, 10/16/2026
As of 2:03AM ET, here is our top tennis bet by edge recommended by our model:
| Matchup | Bet | Odds | Edge | Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medvedev vs. Paul | Tommy Paul ML | +195 @ FanDuel | 2.4% | 36.7% |
List of upcoming tennis matches to bet on now
- WTA Wuhan: Maria Sakkari vs. Maja Chwalinska (2:20AM ET, Friday)
- ATP Shanghai: Casper Ruud vs. Rafael Jodar (2:30AM ET, Friday)
- ATP Shanghai: Tommy Paul vs. Daniil Medvedev (6:00AM ET, Friday)
- WTA Wuhan: Iga Swiatek vs. Ann Li (7:00AM ET, Friday)
- ATP Shanghai: Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs. Alexander Zverev (12:00AM ET, Saturday)
Conclusion
Our tennis best bets are locked and loaded for October 16, 2026, featuring plays such as Tommy Paul ML vs. Daniil Medvedev. Powered by advanced simulations, these picks are here to boost your betting game.
Our predictions are grounded in current data to help you make informed decisions. For additional resources and advice, head to our Responsible Gambling hub.
All odds and probabilities in this article are correct and accurate at the time of publication.



